Killing Viruses: Is it possible?

Of course it possible to kill computer viruses even with barehands.

Around the Kenyan Election campains I killed the kibaki virus with very simple tools (http://blog.m-hi.org/2007/12/encounter-with-kibakithe-virus.html). Last year I killed and completely removed the confiker virus in 4hrs; again with barehands(http://blog.m-hi.org/2009/07/ha-ha-wakoleka-conficker.html). Afew days ago I killed a dialer which paralysed every application and disabled cdrom to prevent removal and formating at Mayanjano Cafe.

I wanted to write some article about it. So I googled 'killing viruses'. The first result was killing viruses(http://www.livescience.com/health/080205-virus-shattering.html) with laser light. So it found priority even to me.

Just a few days ago my mum has been telling me a Chinise Doctor is using something like a burning wood(chisinga) to cure HIV. The idea seemed impossible scientifically. I have been putting it off like:
probably a way of making money. But several times she has told me people who go there go to get tested and are found without the virus.

Then with this article killing viruses with laser light by shattering the capsid at resonant frequency, it all clicked in. The device being percieved as chisinga(burning wood) from its amber laser light.

The article is 2yrs old. And 2yrs is way to long a period not to be able to find the resonant frequency for the AIDS virus. And the research is Chinese.

A cure for HIV/AIDS.

Why Banks Become Useless.

Money is defined as a medium of exchange or store of value.

Suppose I grow maize. I can either store Maize in a granery and apply preservatives to the Maize or Sell my Maize to companies like Admarc to do the preservation. By the process of preservation, they have added value to the Maize and the Maize would not be sold at the same price I sold it.

When I sell maize I exchange my maize with money which should store the value of the maize I have sold.

If I keep money at home, it might be destroyed and I have lost some value so I must keep it at the Bank. However, there are some banks which make so many deductions even from a savings account. I again end up losing value of the maize I sold by putting it the bank.

Meanwhile, when I want to buy maize later, my maize has gained value so I buy it back at highier price. I find that its even more expensive to sell my maize to Admarc than preserve it myself.

Suppose I am an employee. The value of my service is also stored in the money. If I deposit it in such a bank, its like putting my money in a porous pocket. Bad!


--
Accept The Challenge God Will Guide - Phwezi Sec. School.

Operation Bwezani: Economic and Trade Laws.

I have been reading a book: Mastering Commerce by R.R. Pitfield published by MacMillan Press in 1982 and reprinted in 1983. ISBN 0 333 31065 9. It is in very simple english and easy to understand.

Chapter 22 from section 5 talks about consumer protection. It would have been better if I could put in the whole text but I will try to summaries.

Consumers are supposed to buy wisely but their wisdom is as far as the seller's/advertisers integrity. Consumers are therefore in need of protection by:
- acts of parliament.
- consumer advise services
- industries following codes of practice
- indicating standards by labelling.

With the introduction of capitalism with liberalised economic laws, most regulatory authorities have found themselves crippled unable to act for lack of understanding or fear of breaking liberal economic laws. As a result so much consumer exploitation has gone into this country Malawi unchecked and unregulated in such a maner that it seems to be the norm of operating with everyone having complained and gotten tired, and most do not who to complain to to get help.

The book states laws of protection from:
- situations where companies might agree not to compete against one another so as to keep prices extremely high(these I have seen starting from minibuses/taxis operators, sole traders to big companies like Zain and TNM, for example - my suspicion).
- Misleading price qoutes(Game Store is really guilty).
- Inferior products(chilichonse chalowa china).
- Harmful/adultered ingredients.
- Unjust quantities.
- Dishonest advertising
- Undisclosed conditions on credit agreements (Banks are very guilty, NBS being one I have known).
- Refusal to replace or repair faulty products (with china products almost every china trader is guilty).

There is an Office of Fair Trading and a Fair Trading Act 1973(must be of the British Laws) this act should still be intact and active under the Laws of Malawi and should still be applicable today. This enforces the different consumer protection and fair trade laws.
-It describes obligations and rights on sale of goods both for the buy
and seller.
-It also defines what amounts to violation of the laws and this is reviewed periodically to catch up with trade evolution.

I would include adulteration as Zain has been doing under violation of fair trade.

Commerce students have learned all these. Why do we still suffer?

They, like all other educated staff on issues of trade, are employed by profit making organisations who's goal is to maximise profit as much as possible. Because of these consentrations of expertise, consumers(like employees on labour laws) find themselves at a very big disadvantage because of exploitation if there is no equally qualified regulatory authority to regulate companies against consumer/employee exploitation.

Workers in these companies with their division of labour do their duties to the best of abilities getting bonuses and promotions for good work done not knowing their good work is hurting fellow human beings all over.

Humans in cubicles driving big beasts called companies very efficiently not knowing these beasts are feeding on fellow human beings for fuel. What a tragedy!

WTO wants our trade laws to be aligned with international trade laws. I feel it would be very unwise to copy these laws whole sale.
- There is no, if not, very small Africa Representation to talk welfare of Africans.
- Most of the Laws might be devised to benefit already rich nations which are very vocal than poor nations(for obvious reasons).

On issues of trade, the rich would always have an upper hand over the poor.

I would agree with the conclision of capitalistic or socialist economy that it needs to be well regulated. That is to say, an economy must be regulated. Free trade or liberal economy gives very huge room for exploitation. And in this view it is only good for governments to prioritise native investments than multi-national ones. For multinational ones would really act as syphons of other countries economies to the companies' native country. Countries like Malawi find themselves then at a big disadvantage. They would have to compete at international level and again at national level. Even for international companies, it is only fair that their investiments and profits stay within the countries of operation.

Again in a regulated economy, it should be noted that the business community are very vocal than the people themselves such that they advance their interest more than the people. The outcome is that the people may still suffer even under a regulated economy if the government itself does not play the primary role of safe-guarding its people.

Most economic commentators are of the view of establishing companies to create more jobs I think this advances slavery of human beings to companies than to let them live their lives. Life is meant to be lived not to work in companies, with unfair conditions and dump ears to the suffering cries of humanity.

I hope for heaven on earth.

--
Accept The Challenge God Will Guide - Phwezi Sec. School.

Educating the Young Ones

It came to mind over breakfast this morning chatting my uncle who teaches at primary over the syllabus.

Among so many problems like under-staffing, lack of encouragement from parents/guardians, the syllabus itself fell under question.

Pupils are taught in local language from standard one to standard five. They are then taught in english. My assumption was so many students would find themselves failing. And it was so. And paradoxically there was a student who managed to pass standard eight and got selected to a secondary school without knowing how to read. Probably passed from recall exams being in multiple choice.

Why is it a problem to start english at standard five?

A person is able to understand something if he is able to be communicated to. To grasp knowledge one must understand the language in which the knowledge is communicated. Vast knowledge is communicated in english. While it is important to understand a local language, the more languages one understands the more the knowledge he is able to grasp. For pupils learning in local language, they find themselves at a disadvantage to understand english.

To learn a language, you learn better if you are able to practice it and apply it. Local languages have a lot of time to be practiced then than english. English gets less than one hour formal practice, local language gets full day at home and at school. If other subjects were taught at least in english at early level, english would have half a day of practice and application everyday.

A local language which is already known from birth may still be important for formalization especially for written form.

I believe local language might have been introduced with the assumption that our kids are too dull to grasp knowledge in english.

But are they? The advantage of english is that one is now able to grasp other forms of knowledge on their own if they fail to go further with education but have books around to read. This makes the likes of William Kamkwamba and his windmill electricity. Such boy becomes a wonder these days for there are too few who are able to grasp knowledge at a young age on their own.

It is expected that at standard five students might be able to learn comparatively in knew language but I think this is easier for adults who have learned language structures to compare than for kids. Thus I do advise still let them learn in english from early age.

--
Accept The Challenge God Will Guide - Phwezi Sec. School.

The Law

The issue of homosexuality in Malawi raised many concerns on my part that I wanted to look into the Laws.

There seems to be a disrespect or ignorance of its importance of Laws and Constitions at all levels, International and country level. What is the Law? What is it for? How
important is it?

Paul in the book of Romans talks about his tragedy in obeying the Law. He says the Law which is good brings death to him. Does he say we should do away with the Law then? He says far from it. We should uphold it! For the problem is not the Law.

God speaks to Joshua. This book of the Law you should meditate upon it day and night. Keep it deligently then you will be successful in all that you do.

Joshua did strange things. He commanded the sun to stop so he can finish his battle. He fought battles even in his old age and was still strong and Caleb got barren lands(a mountain) to cultivate.

God in giving the law with his people starts it with the Ten commandments. Like a Lecturer introducing a Subject.

These commandments talk about what hurts God's heart. What hurts other human beings and what is good to do.

The law is then expounded with different situations and applications which are recorded as part of the law. It gives resolutions to different problems arising between people. What people need to do for their own good since we have another enemy other than other people(the devil).

The laws of God therefore gives liberty to men over the spiritual enemy and also resolutions to problems developing among themselves.

How have we taken the Law? We have take it as a tool for punishing. It goes hunting for wrongs. It becomes abused to trap even the innocent. It sometimes condemns with partiality in the hands of men abusing it. And also in the hands of the spiritual enemy the devil.

Do we discurd it? When Paul describes the law as the Sword. It is really that for we can use it to justify ourselves and avoid the harms that can befall us if mislead by the enemy.

It defines what is right and what is wrong. It shows how we can deal issues when one man wrongs another. It gives many outlets for an innocent person. It gives what is expected of an offender in the resolution. If you study the law in the Bible it is the best law, giving you all sorts of freedoms.

Paul says as Christians we are not bound by the Law. Does he mean as christians we should disregard the Law? Nope, As christians, it is
expected we have understood its value and we obey it willingly knowing what it is between us and God. He however says God has instituted government to maintain order to the non-believing society.

Those who break laws found themselves punishable under their government, society and God.

I stooped down one day and thought under man made law. I found that man could change a law today and change it again tomorrow and I found myself lost in the myriad of the laws by man.

I decided that I myself should have a standard by which to live in this life and keep sane. The Word of God I found to be the best choice. I found myself by living it, I was obedient to man's laws and kept sane when man tried to go left when he was supposed to go right.

--
Accept The Challenge God Will Guide - Phwezi Sec. School.